The Famous galaxy Brand!I hope everyone is familiar with the name Galaxy.Everyone should be cause
Samsung has made it so popular.Samsung has been using the celestial surname to denote its Android smartphone and tablet products for years. But as the
South Korean OEM continues to flood the market with more and more products, the name is losing its edge, slowly diluting into nothingness amid a sea of similarly overused
brand names. And that’s not just sad; it’s harmful to the company’s image.
he first Samsung smartphone of any importance to bear the Galaxy sub-brand was the initial
Galaxy S,launched in 2010.It was one heck of a smartphone at its time,its 9.9mm thickness was ultra-thin for the time, and other standout features like its S-
AMOLED display and powerful hardware helped it make a name for itself. By January of the following year, Samsung had sold 10 million of the devices globally.
After such success,Samsung ,as expected,continued this sequel of galaxy smartphones.Soon came the inevitable
Galaxy S II, predecessor to today’s “next big thing,” the Galaxy S III superphone. Within that line, Samsung has retained the “S” as a relatively consistent indicator of these devices’ premium status, but that’s the only area of the company’s brand strategy where it’s shown any kind of restraint. In the two years since the original Galaxy S launched, we've seen Samsung go from assigning the stellar sub-brand only to high-end devices, to slapping the Galaxy label on nearly every Android product it launches.
To be fair to Samsung, you can kind of see what the company is going for here. I’m obviously no marketing or advertising professional, but the nature of sub-brands is pretty straightforward. “Hey look, it’s a (Major Company Brand) product! And it’s part of their (
Product Line A) family, which I know I like, versus their (Product B) device lineup, which doesn't suit my needs.” We see this brand division gradually making itself apparent between Samsung’s “Galaxy”-centric Android line and its “Ativ” Windows 8 offerings.
If that’s Samsung’s strategy going forward, more power to it– but it needs to be consistent. Right now, the Galaxy brand situation is akin to the “Droid” problem we sometimes run into with Verizon’s lineup. There, consumers get no clear indication of what constitutes a “Droid” as opposed to just a plain
Android phone; sometimes, smartphones get demoted from Droid status for no good reason, as happened with the
Samsung Droid Charge (kind of).
The same thing is happening to the Galaxy brand. It hasn't blanketed the entirety of Samsung’s Android lineup, but it’s certainly not confined to the high end anymore. There’s even confusion at the samsung.com/galaxy homepage, whose 163 listed phones are a mix of devices both Galaxy-branded and not. And that’s not even taking into account the tablet situation. Oh, and there’s now a media player thrown into the mix, as well as a camera. A camera. It’s a mess.
he results of this brand confusion are already being felt, in both positive and negative ways. On the plus side, Samsung has flooded the market with so much Galaxy-based buzz that, as my colleague Joe Levi recently pointed out, people now identify some high-end smartphones by that sub-brand. “Oh, is that the Galaxy?” people routinely ask me when they see me using my Galaxy S III in public. “Samsung” is almost never mentioned, nor is “Android;” to the eyes of the advertising-addled public, the device simply becomes “the Galaxy.”
That’s good news in that it speaks to the popularity of Samsung’s products, but bad news if the company is hoping for any kind of specificity. Yes, the Galaxy S III, one of the best-reviewed and most-popular smartphones of all time, is in the club, but so too are the pitiful Galaxy Ace and the weirdo Galaxy Camera. People frustrated by the sluggish performance of the former and confused about the relevance of the latter aren’t necessarily going to equate the Galaxy brand with a positive feeling. That’s no good.
In a world full of mega-brands, sub-brands, and hybrid brands, confusion is the enemy. In the competition-on-steroids environment of mobile technology, it can be fatal. Obviously it’s not as critical a problem for Samsung as it would be for a smaller company, but it’s still sloppy. And for a company so bent on defeating a competitor with a much simpler, unified brand, sloppiness isn’t acceptable. Samsung needs to decide exactly what the Galaxy brand is and what it means, before it becomes the “Droid” of the new decade.